Historical Backgrounds
The World Behind Woman with a Leica
Europe Between Revolutions and Ruins
Europe in the 1930s was a continent fraying at the edges. The aftermath of the First World War had left deep economic wounds, national resentments, and fragile democracies. Over the course of two decades, these unresolved tensions fermented into fascist regimes, populist revolutions, world war, and occupation. Woman with a Leica unfolds against this backdrop, and to understand its world, one must first understand the one Greta Anckermann inhabited.
The Weimar Republic and the Rise of Nazism (1919–1933)
Germany’s Weimar Republic, established after the collapse of the German Empire in 1918, was a bold but unstable experiment in democracy. The early 1920s saw hyperinflation, political assassinations, and frequent changes in government. Yet Berlin in the late 1920s became a hub of avant-garde art, literature, and philosophy — a city where Bauhaus architecture, expressionist cinema, and daring journalism flourished. Women gained the right to vote, cabarets challenged moral norms, and artists like George Grosz, Hannah Höch, and Otto Dix critiqued society through powerful visual work.
However, the Great Depression of 1929 triggered mass unemployment and social collapse. By 1932, nearly six million Germans were unemployed. Extremist parties gained ground, and in January 1933, Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor. Within months, the Reichstag Fire Decree and the Enabling Act dismantled the rule of law and civil liberties. Political opponents were arrested or murdered. Independent media and trade unions were shut down. Jews were systematically purged from public life, and anti-Semitic propaganda saturated daily existence.
From this point forward, Germany ceased to be a functioning democracy. The Third Reich had begun.
Surveillance, Propaganda, and Control
The Nazi regime understood the power of image. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda, wielded film, radio, and photography to craft a world in which dissent was equated with treason. The camera became both a witness and a weapon. Photographers and journalists who did not conform to the state’s message were silenced — imprisoned, exiled, or killed.
The famous Leica camera — lightweight, fast, and revolutionary — became a tool not only for photojournalism but also for clandestine documentation. Foreign correspondents and brave locals alike smuggled images of anti-Semitic violence, book burnings, and early concentration camps out of Germany. But the risks were enormous.
Women in photojournalism faced additional obstacles. Although some, like Gerda Taro and Margaret Bourke-White, defied conventions, the field remained overwhelmingly male — especially within official Nazi channels, which relegated women to roles as mothers and moral guardians.
The Spanish Civil War: Prelude to Global Catastrophe (1936–1939)
One of the most significant events preceding the Second World War was the Spanish Civil War. Beginning in 1936, it pitted the democratically elected Republican government against a nationalist uprising led by General Francisco Franco. The conflict quickly escalated into an international proxy war.
Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy supported Franco’s forces with troops, weapons, and airpower. In contrast, the Soviet Union provided aid to the Republicans, and thousands of foreign volunteers joined the International Brigades to defend Spanish democracy. Among them were journalists, photographers, and writers like Ernest Hemingway, Robert Capa, and George Orwell.
This war was notable for the intensity of its propaganda. Both sides used photography and media to shape international opinion. Bombings of civilian targets, such as the infamous destruction of Guernica in 1937, shocked the world. Picasso’s painting of the same name captured the horror, but photographs from the front lines offered the first real-time visual documentation of modern total war.
The Spanish Civil War became a proving ground for Hitler’s new weapons and tactics. It was also a moral test for the rest of Europe — one which, in many ways, it failed. The Western democracies, adopting a policy of non-intervention, did little to stop Franco or the fascist tide.
Anschluss and the Annexation of Austria (1938)
In March 1938, Nazi Germany annexed Austria in what was euphemistically called the Anschluss. Despite promises of independence in the Treaty of Saint-Germain (1919), Austria became a province of the Third Reich almost overnight. The annexation was met with both orchestrated enthusiasm and real fear.
For many Austrians, particularly Jews, leftists, and intellectuals, the consequences were immediate and terrifying. Mass arrests began. Jewish businesses were looted in the "Anschluss pogroms." Prominent Austrians such as Stefan Zweig and Sigmund Freud fled the country. Others were less fortunate.
Vienna, once a city of culture and diversity, became an occupied capital where informants flourished and Gestapo brutality was routine. Women, especially those who had careers or political identities, were expected to conform to strict Nazi gender roles or face persecution.
The Second World War: 1939–1945
Hitler’s invasion of Poland in September 1939 marked the beginning of the Second World War. The war quickly spread across Europe. France fell in 1940. The Luftwaffe bombarded Britain in 1940–41. Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, opened the Eastern Front — a theater of conflict unmatched in brutality.
The Holocaust, the systematic genocide of six million Jews, escalated in secrecy under the cover of war. The machinery of death — ghettos, concentration camps, mass shootings — expanded with terrifying precision. Those who documented or resisted it, including photographers, were hunted.
Neutral countries like Switzerland became hotbeds of espionage. Cities like Geneva were filled with diplomats, exiles, spies, and collaborators. The war blurred moral lines. Some who resisted also betrayed. Some who served totalitarian regimes later claimed ignorance or necessity.
Women in occupied Europe often had to survive by blending in. Many took on roles in resistance movements — smuggling information, sheltering fugitives, or forging documents. Others were blackmailed into collaboration. Still others tried to remain invisible, only to be drawn into the maelstrom.
Postwar Europe and the Cold War Divide (1945–1955)
By 1945, Europe lay in ruins. Germany was occupied and divided. Austria was partitioned into zones controlled by the U.S., U.K., France, and the Soviet Union. Vienna, like Berlin, was a city split between victors. Allied and Soviet forces coexisted in an uneasy truce.
Denazification began, but inconsistently. Some war criminals were brought to trial — most famously at Nuremberg. But many others, especially in lower bureaucratic or intelligence roles, were absorbed into the postwar order. In the early years of the Cold War, anti-communism often took precedence over justice.
The 1950s saw the consolidation of the Iron Curtain. Austria regained full sovereignty in 1955, declaring its neutrality in return for the withdrawal of Soviet troops. But in places like Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and East Germany, Stalinist regimes tightened control. Surveillance remained part of daily life.
Geneva, as a neutral city and home to international organizations, became a haven for refugees, but also for intelligence agents. The Cold War espionage world — of microphones hidden in lamps and messages smuggled in newspapers — was built on the ashes of the fascist one.
Conclusion: A Lens on History
The Europe of Woman with a Leica was not shaped solely by battles, but by silences. It was a time when truth was often dangerous — and those who sought to capture it on paper or film risked everything.
The historical canvas of the 1930s to 1950s was painted with shifting ideologies, failed democracies, brutal occupations, and reluctant reconciliations. Women like Greta, whether fictional or real, did not just survive history — they bore witness to it, often at great personal cost.
Understanding this era means recognizing the fragile line between resistance and complicity, heroism and survival. And that is precisely what makes Woman with a Leica more than a novel. It’s a reckoning with the world that was — and the lives that tried to outlast it.
The World Behind Eating with the Devil
Europe in the Shadow of Victory (1945–1950)
The end of World War II did not bring immediate peace to Europe. Instead, it ushered in a chaotic, morally ambiguous transition period that was every bit as dangerous, if not more so, than the war itself. Eating with the Devil is set precisely in this space — in the ruins, deals, and silences of postwar Europe.
To understand this world, we must look beyond the headlines of victory and reconstruction, and into the uneasy compromises, hidden crimes, and shifting alliances that shaped the Cold War order.
A Continent in Ruins
By May 1945, Europe lay devastated. More than 60 million people had died globally, including 6 million Jews murdered in the Holocaust. Cities like Warsaw, Berlin, and Vienna were reduced to rubble. Infrastructure had collapsed. Civilians starved. Refugees — some 40 million of them — flooded roads and borders in search of food, shelter, and family.
In this vacuum of power and morality, the victors — the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France — divided Germany and Austria into occupation zones. Berlin and Vienna, like the countries they belonged to, were split between the four powers. Tensions between the Western Allies and the Soviet Union flared immediately, turning former allies into geopolitical rivals.
While borders were being redrawn on paper, new ones were being built in people’s minds — between old loyalties and new realities, between war crimes and political usefulness.
Denazification: Justice or Performance?
One of the most urgent questions in postwar Europe was: what to do with the Nazis?
The Allied forces launched a process known as denazification — an attempt to purge former Nazis from positions of power and hold war criminals accountable. The most high-profile of these efforts was the Nuremberg Trials (1945–46), where leading Nazi officials were prosecuted for crimes against humanity.
Yet Nuremberg was the exception, not the rule.
Across Germany and Austria, thousands of mid-level Nazi officials, SS officers, propagandists, and industrialists quietly re-entered civilian life. Many received light punishments or were never prosecuted at all. The logic was simple, if brutal: rebuilding Europe — especially in the West — required experienced administrators, businessmen, and bureaucrats. And many of those had Nazi pasts.
Corporations that had profited from slave labor (such as IG Farben, Siemens, or Deutsche Bank) restructured, renamed, or negotiated settlements. Public memory began to shift: blame was deflected, atrocities minimized, and myths of collective ignorance took root.
The Cold War only accelerated this moral erosion. As the United States and its allies prioritized anti-communist stability, former Nazis were often viewed as lesser threats — or even assets.
The Rise of Espionage and the Birth of the Cold War
The power vacuum left by the fall of Nazi Germany quickly became the battleground of the next great conflict: the Cold War.
By 1947, ideological lines were hardening. In Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union installed communist regimes from Warsaw to Sofia, while the West promoted liberal capitalism and U.S.-led economic recovery via the Marshall Plan. The continent was dividing not by open warfare but by information, alliances, and influence.
This new era demanded new tools: intelligence services, secret operations, and disinformation.
In this world, former spies and collaborators were in high demand. Knowledge of Nazi files, Soviet agents, border routes, and black markets could make someone valuable overnight — regardless of their past allegiances.
Vienna, especially, became a cauldron of espionage. Like Berlin, it was divided into four occupation zones. But its location — bordering communist Hungary and Czechoslovakia — made it a crossroads for refugees, smugglers, diplomats, and spies. British MI6, the Soviet NKVD (later KGB), the newly formed CIA, and countless smaller services operated in the same city, often from offices just blocks apart.
Deals were struck in cafés. Files changed hands in parks. People disappeared.
Information became currency. Silence became survival.
The Role of Women in the Postwar Underworld
Women played critical, often unacknowledged, roles in the grey zones of postwar Europe.
While the war had drawn millions of women into factories, resistance networks, and support roles, the return of peace brought an expectation that they would resume their “traditional” place in the home. But many did not — or could not.
Some, like war widows or displaced persons, survived by trading information, acting as couriers, or entering relationships with occupying soldiers and diplomats. Others, particularly those with language skills or political knowledge, became involved — willingly or under coercion — in the intelligence world.
Female agents and informants could move with less suspicion than their male counterparts. But their roles were precarious. They were both vital and expendable. Their loyalties were often questioned, and their pasts — especially if they had been associated with Nazis or resistance fighters — were used as leverage.
The boundary between victim and collaborator, agent and traitor, was often blurred beyond recognition.
Refugees, Displaced Persons, and War Criminals on the Move
By 1948, refugee camps dotted the landscape of Austria, Italy, and Germany. These were filled not just with Holocaust survivors or political exiles, but also with former soldiers, collaborators, and civilians with nowhere to return.
Some tried to rebuild their lives. Others tried to vanish.
The postwar years saw a massive effort to track down and bring Nazi war criminals to justice. But many slipped through. The so-called “ratlines” — clandestine escape routes — helped thousands flee Europe, often with the help of sympathetic clergy or intelligence operatives. Some escaped to South America. Others simply changed names and started over in Western Europe or the United States.
Austria, and particularly Vienna, became a temporary hiding ground for many of these individuals. Its chaotic bureaucracy, black market economy, and borderland status made it easy to disappear — or to be recruited.
Files were forged. Identities were laundered. Moral debts were shelved.
Justice vs. Truth: A New Order of Compromise
One of the most unsettling realities of postwar Europe was the distinction between justice and truth.
Yes, the war had ended. But many truths remained buried — deliberately so. Entire networks of officials, companies, and collaborators depended on amnesia. Political expediency often demanded forgetting.
Governments — both East and West — struck silent deals with former enemies. War crimes were downplayed to maintain alliances. Former resistance members were sidelined if they were politically inconvenient. Victims were told to move on.
This was a world not of clean victories, but of negotiated silence.
Truth became a commodity — something to be sold, hidden, or spun.
And in that world, figures like Greta Anckermann — if they existed — served as reluctant archivists. Not heroes. Not villains. Witnesses.
The Return of Austria: Neutrality and Forgetting
In 1955, a decade after the war’s end, Austria regained full sovereignty with the signing of the Austrian State Treaty. The price of freedom was neutrality: Austria pledged to remain non-aligned in the Cold War and prohibited the stationing of foreign troops.
But freedom also came with forgetting.
Austria embraced the “first victim” narrative — the idea that it had been the first target of Nazi aggression in 1938, rather than a willing partner. This myth allowed many Austrians to avoid accountability for collaboration or complicity.
By the late 1940s and early 1950s, Vienna had transformed from a city of trauma to a city of amnesia. The past was too dangerous. The future, too uncertain. Silence became a civic virtue.
Conclusion: The Politics of Silence
Eating with the Devil captures the moral architecture of postwar Europe — a landscape where truth was traded like a suitcase, where justice bowed to politics, and where those who remembered were often left behind.
The novel’s backdrop is not just historical — it is a mirror. It reminds us that wars do not end with treaties. They end when people stop asking questions.
In this Europe, Greta Anckermann is not chasing justice. She’s walking through the ruins of it — camera in hand, eyes open, memory intact.
The World Behind To the Horizon and Back
Europe in Ruins, the World in Reach: Alma Karlin’s Century
The story of Alma Karlin begins not with glory but with aftermath.
The year is 1919. The First World War has just ended, but peace is fragile, uneven, and deceptive. Across Europe and beyond, entire empires have collapsed, societies have been dismembered, and economies are gasping for recovery. The world Alma set out to explore — alone, with an Erika typewriter and a fierce mind — was not one of ease, but one of transformation, conflict, and paradox.
1919: The End of War, the Birth of Instability
World War I, known at the time as the Great War, had fundamentally changed the political and geographic landscape of Europe and its colonies. Four major empires disintegrated in its wake:
-
The Austro-Hungarian Empire, to which Alma’s native Slovenia once belonged, was broken up into successor states, including the newly formed Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia).
-
The German Empire collapsed and became the Weimar Republic, burdened with the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles.
-
The Russian Empire had already given way to Bolshevik revolution and civil war.
-
The Ottoman Empire would soon be dismantled, giving rise to the modern Middle East under European mandates.
In the immediate postwar period, Europe was exhausted. Economies had been drained, entire generations were lost to the trenches, and millions more had died from the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic. Borders were redrawn without regard for ethnic or cultural realities, and rising nationalist sentiments began to fester in the cracks left behind by imperial disintegration.
It was from this disoriented Europe that Alma Karlin departed. A woman, alone, with no institutional support, no patronage, and no roadmap — in a time when independence of that kind was not just rare, but radical.
Women and the Limits of Exploration
The early 20th century was not an era that welcomed female travelers, especially those who defied gender norms.
Although some pioneering women had ventured abroad — Mary Kingsley in West Africa, Alexandra David-Néel in Tibet — they were often exceptions tolerated more for their eccentricity than admired for their courage or insight. Travel was considered a male domain. The very act of leaving one’s home unaccompanied as a woman was frequently viewed as immoral, mad, or dangerous.
Alma Karlin ignored these expectations.
Fluent in multiple languages and possessing deep curiosity about the world, Alma set out to see the planet without the filter of empire or masculinity. Her journeys — spanning from the islands of Southeast Asia to the mountains of South America — defied colonial conventions.
Yet her presence was often met with suspicion. In a world where white, male colonizers were used to control, categorize, and dominate, a solitary woman moving through these spaces was difficult to understand. She was often forced to negotiate not just language barriers, but ideological ones: local customs, colonial administrators, military zones, and social codes that treated her as a threat or anomaly.
Colonialism and the Global South
Karlin traveled through a world still under the firm grip of European colonialism. In the 1920s, the British Empire was at its height, controlling nearly a quarter of the world’s population and land. The French Empire stretched across West Africa and Southeast Asia. The Dutch governed Indonesia. The Japanese Empire had expanded into Korea and parts of China. The U.S. maintained strategic control over the Philippines and Pacific islands.
Colonialism during this era was not just political — it was deeply racial and economic. Indigenous populations were often excluded from education, land ownership, and civic rights. Labor was extracted through brutal systems. Culture was suppressed in favor of European languages, religions, and values.
Karlin’s writings reveal a consciousness that differed from the mainstream narratives of her time. She engaged with the cultures she encountered not as curiosities, but as valid and complex societies. Though a product of her era, Alma refused to let the colonial lens define her understanding of the world.
Her status — as a white European woman — gave her access that many others lacked. But she used that access not to dominate, but to document and reflect.
Return and Rejection
Alma Karlin returned to Europe in the early 1930s, after nearly a decade of travel. The continent she returned to was even more unstable than the one she had left.
The global economy had collapsed after the 1929 Wall Street crash. In Germany, Adolf Hitler was rising to power. Italy had already succumbed to Mussolini’s fascism. Across Central and Eastern Europe, authoritarian regimes were replacing fragile democracies.
Alma’s native Slovenia, now part of Yugoslavia, had undergone dramatic shifts. Ethnic tensions simmered under the surface. The kingdom was centralized, its governance increasingly autocratic.
Despite the extraordinary nature of her journeys and her extensive literary work, Alma was not celebrated upon her return. She was marginalized by the male-dominated literary and academic establishments. Her writing was dismissed as eccentric. Her travels were not seen as achievements but as peculiar detours for a woman “out of place.”
Some speculated about her mental health. Others whispered about her gender nonconformity or spiritual beliefs. In a conservative, politically charged environment, Alma was viewed as socially and ideologically inconvenient.
The Nazi Occupation of Yugoslavia and the Silencing of Alma
In April 1941, Nazi Germany invaded Yugoslavia. Slovenia was carved up and occupied by German, Italian, and Hungarian forces. German-occupied Lower Styria, where Alma lived, was subjected to a brutal process of Germanization. Slovene language, culture, and identity were suppressed.
During this time, Alma’s books — which expressed humanist, anti-totalitarian themes — were banned. Her home was raided by Nazi officers. She was labeled politically unreliable and placed under surveillance.
It is believed that Alma’s deep interest in Eastern philosophy, as well as her outspoken views, contributed to her marginalization. She lived under constant threat, yet continued to write in private. She sheltered refugees and refused to endorse fascism, even as neighbors collaborated and prospered.
Her experiences during the war exemplify the tragic fate of many intellectuals and artists who did not fit neatly into the narratives of power. While collaborators were rewarded and opportunists thrived, individuals like Alma — who had devoted their lives to truth, exploration, and culture — were treated with suspicion and erased from public life.
Post-War Silence and Belated Recognition
After the war ended in 1945, Yugoslavia emerged under Josip Broz Tito as a socialist federation. Though no longer under fascist rule, the state maintained a strict ideological and cultural framework. Alma, now aging and in poor health, continued to live in near obscurity.
She died in 1950, her work largely forgotten by the institutions that should have preserved and honored it.
It was only decades later, in the 1980s and 1990s, that scholars and readers began to rediscover Alma Karlin. Her travel writings, diaries, and letters revealed a singular voice — honest, sensitive, sometimes raw, but always thoughtful. She is now recognized in Slovenia as one of its most unique literary and historical figures.
Today, exhibitions, biographies, and even museums preserve her legacy. But that recognition came late — and speaks to a broader pattern of silencing women whose lives defied cultural expectations.
Conclusion: A Voice that Refused to Vanish
The world Alma Karlin moved through was one shaped by colonial dominance, patriarchy, and the traumas of war. She walked into that world without protection, title, or wealth — and documented it not to dominate, but to understand.
Her return to Europe, her rejection, and her later persecution under fascism were not separate chapters, but extensions of the same reality: a world unready for a woman who saw too much, traveled too far, and spoke too freely.
To the Horizon and Back is not merely a fictionalized journey. It is a reclaiming of history — of a real woman, in a real world, who recorded with clear eyes what others refused to see.
The World Behind Harvesting a Storm
Belgrade, Spring 1941 — The Kingdom on the Brink
Harvesting a Storm takes place during a brief but defining window in Yugoslav history — the days between the country’s reluctant alignment with Nazi Germany and its violent undoing just 72 hours later. These were days when politics moved faster than breath, when foreign powers manipulated entire governments, and when resistance — whispered or shouted — could change the fate of a continent.
Understanding this novel’s world means entering Belgrade in March 1941: a city tense with uncertainty, its government torn between submission and sovereignty, its people standing on the precipice of destruction.
The Kingdom of Yugoslavia Before the Storm
The Kingdom of Yugoslavia was formed in 1918, after the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the end of World War I. Originally known as the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, it united various South Slavic peoples under one monarchy — but it was never a fully integrated or stable state.
Ethnic divisions, political violence, royal authoritarianism, and regional rivalries plagued the kingdom throughout the 1920s and 1930s. By the late 1930s, with King Alexander I assassinated (1934) and political parties increasingly fragmented, the government leaned toward authoritarianism to preserve unity.
In 1939, as World War II erupted across Europe, Yugoslavia declared neutrality. But that neutrality was unsustainable. Hitler’s Germany had overrun Poland, Denmark, Norway, France, the Low Countries, and was now preparing for war against the Soviet Union. Yugoslavia was a geographical keystone — a crucial corridor between Italy, Greece, and the eastern front Hitler was assembling.
The Tripartite Pact: Submission Under Pressure
By early 1941, most of southeastern Europe had either allied with or been absorbed by the Axis powers. Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria had joined the Tripartite Pact — the formal alliance between Germany, Italy, and Japan. Only Yugoslavia remained uncommitted, surrounded and increasingly isolated.
The pressure on Belgrade intensified. Hitler demanded that Yugoslavia join the Axis. The regency, led by Prince Paul — acting on behalf of the young King Peter II — feared German invasion and saw alignment as the only path to preservation. After weeks of negotiations and mounting external threats, Yugoslavia signed the Tripartite Pact on March 25, 1941 in Vienna.
Officially, the agreement allowed Yugoslavia to preserve its territorial integrity and military independence. In reality, it was a public submission to fascist control. The news was met with immediate and widespread public outrage.
The Coup of March 27: A Nation Revolts
Within 48 hours of signing the Pact, an unexpected event changed everything. On March 27, 1941, a group of pro-Western military officers staged a bloodless coup in Belgrade. The regent, Prince Paul, was deposed. Seventeen-year-old King Peter II was declared of age and placed at the head of a new royalist government.
The coup was widely supported by the public, especially in Belgrade. Crowds took to the streets waving Serbian and British flags, chanting anti-German slogans. For many, this was a moment of reclaiming national dignity and choosing moral resistance over strategic submission.
But that choice had consequences.
Hitler’s Fury: Operation Retribution
Adolf Hitler reacted with personal outrage to the coup. He saw it not only as a strategic obstacle but as a direct insult. In a meeting on March 27, he ordered "Operation Retribution" (Unternehmen Strafgericht) — the immediate and total punishment of Yugoslavia.
The plan was ruthless and swift. While German troops prepared for a full-scale invasion, the Luftwaffe was tasked with sending a clear message.
On April 6, 1941, without a declaration of war or military provocation, the German Air Force began the bombing of Belgrade. The operation, known in Serbian as April’sko bombardovanje, lasted for days. Civilians were targeted. Hospitals, churches, and historic buildings were reduced to rubble. Estimates of the dead range from 2,000 to over 4,000 in the capital alone.
At the same time, German ground forces invaded from the north, joined by Italian, Hungarian, and Bulgarian troops from other directions. The attack overwhelmed Yugoslav defenses. Within 11 days, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia collapsed.
Belgrade in the Final Days: Tension, Surveillance, Resistance
In the two weeks between the signing of the Tripartite Pact and the German bombing, Belgrade was a city in limbo — and in danger. The government was in disarray. Foreign journalists and diplomats reported being followed, censored, or threatened. Newspapers faced strict controls. Radio stations were watched. Whispers of protest filled homes, cafés, and tram stops — but few dared speak aloud.
Still, resistance simmered.
Patriotic students, army officers, monarchists, Serbian nationalists, and left-wing anti-fascists found themselves briefly aligned in outrage. The coup, while organized by monarchist forces, was cheered by communists and conservatives alike. For a brief moment, the capital pulsed with unity.
But behind the scenes, Germany and its intelligence services had infiltrated Yugoslavia’s military, political, and press circles. The coup leaders misjudged both the strength of German will and the depth of internal instability. What seemed like a moral stand was, tragically, a trigger.
The Broader Picture: Yugoslavia in WWII
After the invasion, Yugoslavia was dismembered. The Germans established a puppet regime in Serbia. Croatia became a Nazi-aligned fascist state under the Ustaše, who launched a genocidal campaign against Serbs, Jews, and Roma. Slovenia was divided between German and Italian occupation. Montenegro was handed to Italian control.
Resistance began immediately, both from royalist Četniks and communist Partisans. The latter, led by Josip Broz Tito, would ultimately play the dominant role in liberating the country by 1945 — but that liberation would come at the cost of brutal reprisals, civil war, and enormous loss of life.
By the end of WWII, Yugoslavia had lost over 1 million people, making it one of the most devastated countries per capita in the conflict.
The Role of Journalists and Intellectuals
During these fraught weeks in March–April 1941, the role of journalists, writers, and independent thinkers was vital — and dangerous.
Those who continued to write honestly or critically — whether in underground papers, foreign correspondence, or private diaries — were subject to arrest, torture, or execution. Foreign journalists were expelled or placed under surveillance. Domestic ones were forced to toe the regime line or go silent.
Still, some continued. Some smuggled stories abroad. Some wrote in code. Some stayed silent until after the war, their words preserved in hidden journals and unpublished manuscripts.
They bore witness in the most dangerous way possible: by writing.
Conclusion: History in a Single Month
Harvesting a Storm is set in a window of barely two weeks — from March 25 to April 6, 1941. And yet within those days, the fate of an entire nation changed.
This was a time when decisions made in hours shaped decades. When resisting fascism was not only moral, but mortal. When speaking truth could mean death — and silence could mean complicity.
The Belgrade of spring 1941 was not yet rubble. People still went to cafés. Newspapers were still printed. Couples still walked by the Sava River. But the atmosphere had changed. The future felt poisoned. The past, unfinished.
And for those — like the real and fictional figures in this story — who chose to write, report, or resist, it was a time of immense courage and unbearable consequence.